In the article "Civil War in Syria Raises Questions About When to Intervene," the author brigns to light the harms of the U.S. troops getting harmed if they intervene in the Syrian Civil War.
There have been threats from Syria saying that they will bomb the troops if they intervene, and that would be terrible. They also threat to use chemical weapons, which is when the U.S. says that they will have to intervene.
In my opinion, I think the U.S. is going to intervene no matter what. They always go and take over wars anywhere, and most of the time, they have nothing to do with us. However, I think it's dangerous either way. For one, if Syria bombed our troops, the families of the troops would be hurt. If they plan to use chemical weapons, I guess our troops could use their chemical weapons. Either way, the outcome won't be good. Which is why I don't like war. War doesn't think about other families, and the worst case scenario. All they think about is winning...but what happens when they don't win?
There have been threats from Syria saying that they will bomb the troops if they intervene, and that would be terrible. They also threat to use chemical weapons, which is when the U.S. says that they will have to intervene.
In my opinion, I think the U.S. is going to intervene no matter what. They always go and take over wars anywhere, and most of the time, they have nothing to do with us. However, I think it's dangerous either way. For one, if Syria bombed our troops, the families of the troops would be hurt. If they plan to use chemical weapons, I guess our troops could use their chemical weapons. Either way, the outcome won't be good. Which is why I don't like war. War doesn't think about other families, and the worst case scenario. All they think about is winning...but what happens when they don't win?
You make a lot of important points, but the US has had times in it's history where we didn't get involved with other countries. This post is also a little short. 80
ReplyDelete